Saturday, August 22, 2020

Petroleum and Middle Indus Basin Essay Example

Oil and Middle Indus Basin Essay Kohat-Potwar Oil and Gas Exploration and Production The main oil very much penetrated in present-day Pakistan was at Kundal on the Potwar Plateau in 1866. The primary business oil revelation was made in the Greater Indus Basin in 1914 when the Attock Oil Company finished a 214 ft well on a push blamed anticline close Khaur on the Potwar Plateau (Khan and others, 1986). Early accomplishment in the Kohat-Potwar geologic territory served to concentrate a significant part of the early investigation action here. The Sui field in the Sulaiman-Kirthar Foreland geologic territory was the primary revelation outside of the Kohat-Potwar geologic area and is the biggest gas disclosure in Pakistan, with in excess of 5 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas saves. Found in 1952, the Sui field is a vault molded reef structure with an anticlinal surface articulation. The biggest stores were found in the 625 m thick Eocene Sui Formation Sui Main Limestone Member. The Sui Upper Limestone Member and upper Eocene Habib Rahi Limestone were likewise profitable. In 1999, Upper Cretaceous Pab Sandstone Formation gas creation started at Sui field. Albeit exploratory wells had been recently bored in the Middle and Lower Indus Basins, the disclosure of the Sui field quickened investigation endeavors during the 1950s. More revelations followed around there with the Zin gas field in 1954, the Uch gas field in 1955, and the Mari gas field in 1957. Investigation movement expanded again during the 1980s, when recognizable proof of a tilted flaw hinder in the Lower Indus Basin prompted the revelation of a progression of oil fields. In spite of the fact that there have been huge oil disclosures in the Lower Indus Basin, it stays a gas-inclined territory. We will compose a custom paper test on Petroleum and Middle Indus Basin explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom paper test on Petroleum and Middle Indus Basin explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom paper test on Petroleum and Middle Indus Basin explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer Gas revelations that are ascribed to the Sembar-Goru/Ghazij TPS have been made in Eocene, Paleocene, and Lower Cretaceous shakes on the Mari-Kandhot High in the Rajasthan Province of India. The Cambrian oil disclosures in Rajasthan, be that as it may, are past the degree of Sembar testimony and are either sourced by updip hydrocarbon relocation from the Sembar or more probable by proximal more established Mesozoic and early Paleozoic rocks. Sembar-Goru/Ghazij Composite Total Petroleum System The Sembar-Goru/Ghazij Composite Total Petroleum System (TPS) as characterized for this appraisal, is a north-south prolonged territory stretching out from the Potwar-Kohat geologic territory in the north to the 2,000 m bathymetric shape in the Arabian Sea . The west limit matches with the pivotal belt and western edge of the Indian plate and the eastern limit reaches out into India on the Indian Shield . Geochemical investigations of potential source shakes and delivered oil and gas have exhibited that the Lower Cretaceous Sembar Formation is the most probable wellspring of oil and gas for the greater part of the creating fields in the Indus Basin. Source Rocks While the Sembar has been distinguished as the essential source rock for a significant part of the Greater Indus Basin, there are other known and potential source rocks. Rock units containing known or potential source rocks incorporate the Salt Range Formation Eocambrian shales, Permian Dandot and Tredian Formations, Triassic Wulgai Formation, Jurassic Datta Formation, Paleocene Patala Formation, Eocene Ghazij Formation, and lower Miocene shales. Of all the conceivable source shakes in the Indus Basin, be that as it may, the Sembar is the most probable hotspot for the biggest bit of the delivered oil and gas in the Indus foreland. In the Kohat-Potwar geologic territory the Paleocene Patala Shale is the essential source rock for most, if not the entirety of the area. In the seaward territories of the Indus geologic territory, Miocene rocks are hypothesized to be acceptable hydrocarbon sources, with the Sembar contributing in the rack region. The Lower Cretaceous Sembar Formation comprises fundamentally of shale with subordinate measures of siltstone and sandstone. The Sembar was stored over a large portion of the Greater Indus Basin in marine situations and ranges in thickness from 0 to in excess of 260 m (Iqbal and Shah, 1980). Rock-eval pyrolysis examinations of 10 examples from the Jandran-1 well in the Sulaiman Range of the foldbelt, demonstrate anâ in all likelihood end up being gas inclined. verage all out natural carbon content (TOC) of 1. 10 percent. The TOC esteems from the Sembar in two Badin territory wells in the foreland segment of the Lower Indus Basin have TOC’s extending from 0. 5 to 3. 5 percent and averaging around 1. 4 percent. A cross-plot of pyrolysis information on an adjusted van-Kreveln chart study demonstrates th at the natural issue in the Sembar is essentially type-III kerogen, fit for producing gas; in any case, extra exclusive information show the nearness of type-II kerogen just as type-III kerogen. As for the oil window (0. 6 1. 3 percent vitrinite reflectance), the Sembar ranges from thermally juvenile to over develop . The Sembar is all the more thermally develop in the western, all the more profoundly covered piece of the rack and gets shallower and less develop toward the eastern edge of the Indus Basinâ Conclusive geochemical information supporting a Sembar hotspot for a large portion of the created oil and gas in the Indus Basin are missing; be that as it may, constrained accessible geochemical and warm information favor a Sembar source. Until this point in time, the main oil-profitable locales in the Greater Indus Basin are the Potwar Plateau in the north and the Badin region in the Lower Indus Basin. Cross-plots of the carbon isotope proportions and the isoprenoid proportions of delivered oils in these two districts are particularly extraordinary , demonstrating two diverse source rocks. Gas content shifts all through the bowl with CO2 running from lt; 1 percent to gt;70 percent, nitrogen lt; 1 percent to gt; 80 percent, and H2S lt; 0. percent to gt; 13 percent (IHS Energy Group, 2001). Stores Productive supplies in the Sembar-Goru/Ghazij Composite TPS incorporate the Cambrian Jodhpur Formation; Jurassic Chiltan, Samana Suk, and Shinawari Formations; Cretaceous Sembar, Goru, Lumshiwal, Moghal Kot, Parh, and Pab Formations; Paleocene Dungan Formation and Ranikot Group; and the Eocene Sui, Kirthar, Sakesar, Bandah, Khuiala, Nammal, and Ghazij Formations . The central supplies are deltaic and shallow-marine sandstones in the lower some portion of the Goru in the Lower Indus Basin and the Lumshiwal Formation in the Middle Indus Basin and limestones in the Eocene Ghazij and comparable stratigraphic units . Potential supplies are as thick as 400 m. Sandstone porosities are as high as 30 percent, yet more usually extend from around 12 to 16 percent; and limestone porosities run from 9 to 16 percent. The porousness of these supplies ranges from 1 to gt; 2,000 milidarcies (md). Store quality for the most part lessens a westbound way however repository thickness increments. On account of the dynamic eastbound disintegration and truncation of Cretaceous shakes, the Cretaceous repositories all have erosional updip limits, while Tertiary supplies broaden more distant east overlying continuously more established rocks. Traps All creation in the Indus Basin is from basic snares. No stratigraphic aggregations have been recognized, despite the fact that the goliath Sui gas field is a vault molded reef structure (perhaps an algal hill) communicated on a superficial level as an anticline. The assortment of auxiliary snares incorporates anticlines, push blamed anticlines, and tilted deficiency squares. The anticlines and pushed anticlines happen in the foreland bits of the Greater Indus Basin as a result of pressure identified with impact of the Indian and Eurasian plates. The tilted flaw traps in the Lower Indus Basin are a result of augmentation identified with fracturing and the arrangement of horst and graben structures. The worldly connections among trap arrangement and hydrocarbon age, removal, movement, and ensnarement are variable all through the Greater Indus Basin. In the foreland parcel, development of auxiliary snares pre-date hydrocarbon age, particularly in the Lower Indus Basin. In the Middle and Upper Indus Basins, traps may likewise have framed preceding hydrocarbon age, despite the fact that the fleeting connections between trap arrangement and hydrocarbon age are not as particular as in the Lower Indus Basin. The basic misshapening in the foldbelt district is commonly contemporaneous with hydrocarbon age, recommending that a portion of the hydrocarbons created from the Sembar presumably spilled to the surface before trap arrangement. Entombment history recreations dependent on information from the Sakhi-Sarwar no. 1 well , situated in the foreland part of the Middle Indus Basin, and the Shahdapur no. 1 well, situated in the foreland part of Lower Indus Basin, show that hydrocarbon age started 40 and 65 Ma, separately . The principle contrasts in the hydrocarbon age times between these wells are because of huge contrasts in the warm slopes; the present-day warm angle in the Sakhi-Sarwar well is 2. 6Â °C/km instead of 3. 3Â °C/km in the Shahdapur well. We decipher the crucial points in time for these wells at around 15 and 50 Ma, separately. In view of these recreations, trap development may have postdated the beginning of hydrocarbon age in the foreland bit of the Indus Basin. Seals The known seals in the framework are made out of shales that are interbedded with and overlying the stores. In creating fields, slender shale beds of variable thickness are compelling seals. Extra seals that might be viable incorporate impermeable seals above truncation traps, deficiencies, and updip facies changes. Overbu

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.